Archive for July, 2007

There are 300 reasons not to see this movie

Monday, July 16th, 2007

Let me see your war face!My goal of writing once a week on Reelfriction is not really working, but the good news is that I have been writing like crazy in other areas of my life. So, my writing muscles are not yet going to atrophy! But just in case anyone is looking forward to a new review, I want to deliver.

There was a movie trailer last summer that blew me away. 300 looked like it would be one of the greatest films I saw this year. I was dissappointed. Now, in honor of the DVD coming out next week, I have written a review of the film. Hopefully, this will steer away any potential viewers. Bottom line: Just watch the trailer.

The trailer for 300 evoked strong feelings in me. It was going to be a movie filled with passion. Men fighting with everything they had to protect their home from certain destruction. All told with style. Not comic book style… but a perverse artistic style. The superhuman Spartans, fetishistic in their muscularity. The mutant army. The jewel-encrusted king. The masked warriors. The giant tree filled with corpses. The modern pounding music and dialog that is roared instead of spoken. All this was edited together tightly and efficiently. The film was going to be overflowing with incredible images, and yes, I’ll say it again: Passion.

I was familiar with the story enough to know that there was ample source material for a script that would make me feel for the characters and their struggle. Given the footage I saw, I wasn’t expecting great dialog and an intricate plot, but I was still expecting a remarkable film. One that stood above predecessors like Braveheart and Gladiator due to its artistic style, passionate story, and unique imagery that would fit the mythology of the story very well.From the start of the film, it falls apart. What could have been an opportunity to flesh out the Spartan people in a really cool training montage was marred by stupid narration and poor editing choices. It felt very disjointed, and the imagery was just not enough to keep me engaged in the story.

When the king grows up, the story jumps right into the setup for the battle. This is good and bad. The bad part is that there wasn’t enough for me to be invested in what was going on. I didn’t know who the Persians were. I didn’t even really know who the Spartans were. They were just portrayed as a civilization built to fight, with no real intent or purpose behind it. The characters weren’t particularly intriguing or like-able, and their actions were one-dimensional. There were some allusions to previous battles and/or decisions the king made, but nothing was ever addressed and the much-needed development was not there at all.

The good part of this was that I didn’t have to listen to that dialog anymore. Now, again, I wasn’t expecting Shakespeare, but I was expecting better than what I got. I thought the screaming would be reserved for the battle sequences, but almost every line was barked out whether necessary or not. Those that weren’t were part of cliché set pieces that were inartfully copied from previous films.

The senate doesn’t want to fight! There is a traitor in their midst! The captain has a son going into battle with him and then the son dies! The army is betrayed by some guy who leads the enemy through a secret path behind them! There is an Oracle who tells the king he will be betrayed! (the oracle is a naked drunk girl, though, that was new). Umm… I thought there were more but that pretty much covers the whole plot.

The fighting was nothing special. Gory and violent, which entertained me slightly on a base level, but with nothing backing it up and no real humanity in the film to make it worthwhile, I just didn’t feel it. The waves of attackers became tiring after awhile. The cool imagery that was in the trailer was fleeting. In fact, the whole film felt like it was filmed indoors. Even the battle scenes. The effects didn’t add much at all, and without those the film has to rely on its script, direction and performances. Which I already told you how much I liked. Also, the narration persisted throughout the film and really annoyed me. It was not needed. If the information in the narration was incorporated into the dialog and character development, the whole thing would have been much more interesting.

The music didn’t help. The cool song from the trailer was replaced by this chanting stuff that really didn’t fit the visual style of the film. Anyway, that’s another minor quibble, but as they say, Its the little things that kill you.

Eventually, the senate thing wraps up and the Spartans are betrayed by a deformed person who they wouldn’t let fight with them. They all die in battle in a spectacularly unspectacular way. I felt nothing for the men, or for the society(?) they were trying to protect. There was no meat to it at all.I just want one thing.... a wizard's hat!

I know what some people are going to say! What did you expect? Well, frankly, I expected better. Is that wrong of me? Is it too much to ask to get a cool movie about Spartans defending their homeland against impossible odds with cool dialog and a good script? I don’t want just a stupid screaming fighting film. Who wants to settle for that? Sure, it was mildly entertaining, and if it wasn’t so absurd how stupid some of it was, it would also be almost completely forgettable. (except for that awesome trailer…. I can’t forget that.)

A word to fans of this film: 300 is not a good film. Gore, action and CGI don’t make a film by themselves. Try something new. Experiment! The world of art is a big wide beautiful place. Open your mind and enjoy it!

A Tribute to Star Trek

Wednesday, July 25th, 2007

Star Trek: The Next GenerationI know I am opening myself up to the wrath of LCD, but here it goes:

Star Trek has always been associated with loner nerds who have no other passions and no real friends. Thus, it has gotten a bad reputation. But let me tell you, I am a die hard Trekkie.

On the eve of the big Star Trek movie announcement, and just having gotten back from a Star Trek Convention, I would like to try to explain why the show is so important to me and to so many other people. And how the fans are much more interesting, intelligent, social, and well-adjusted then you might think.

This story starts with Gene Roddenberry. I had always thought of him as the guy that came up with the idea for Star Trek, and nothing more. But after hearing stories about each of the show’s incarnations from people that actually worked with him, I can see that it was his singular vision that created this marvelous franchise.

Gene Roddenberry hated racism, sexism, capitalism and violence. He envisioned a future where all of this was put behind us. All races and genders were treated equal.

There was no money, there was no war. Humanity had transcended beyond all of this and was now able to travel space, exploring. Finding new worlds, helping those less fortunate, exchanging art and ideas with all organisms, and forever staying true to all of these ideals and the betterment of the whole universe.

To this end, he cast females and non-caucasions in the main roles of his series. He kept away from the militaristic style that the studio wanted him to do. They wanted episodes about the astronauts fighting aliens and killing monsters. He wanted episodes where there as no violence. Just ideas and decisions and discoveries.My friend Yuichi and some Ferengi.

They tried to beat him down, but he took everything they threw at him and fought back. He featured the first interracial kiss, and the studio was not happy about that. After three seasons, the original series was cancelled, but Roddenberry was not done. Years later, he came back with Star Trek: The Next Generation. With this series, he continued to fight against the studio. He didn’t want to see alot of space battles, but they did. He didn’t want to see a lot of soap opera romance, but they did. He stood strong once again and this show ran successfully for seven years.

It left behind some of the best and most powerful episodes of the whole Star Trek cannon. The show subtly (and sometimes not so subtly) had episodes bashing the US foreign policy, racism (which to this day still sadly goes on), sexism, needless brutality, the military, and even organized religion.

Gene Roddenberry was now getting old, and with each passing year he was losing his hold on his beloved franchise. Three more Star Trek series came after The Next Generation ended. They were good in their own ways, but as they went on the ideals that Roddenberry instilled in the franchise were slowly deteriorating.

I am a geek, don't trust my shirt.The last show ended with all of those still intact, but it wasn’t the same. Roddenberry had died and Paramount now had their way with the franchise. They shut down fan clubs, conventions, websites. Anything that they didn’t get money for was fair game. To them, Star Trek is just a money machine, but to the fans, it will always be more.

Roddenberry said a great quote in his last interview before he died. When asked what will happen to the Star Trek franchise after he dies, he said simply: “After I die, the studio will kill it.”

And sadly, he may be right. There is a new movie in the works. The first one to be made without any input from Roddenberry. Tomorrow they will announce more, but all we know now is that it is being directed by J.J. Abrams, and is going to be a *cringe* reboot of the series.

Only time will tell, but with any luck this film will capture the spirit that has made this franchise so beloved by fans: the idea that there can be a better future.

A future where humanity will pull itself out of its horrible state and strive for world where everyone, regardless of gender, race, creed, and species, can live together in peace and harmony. What is there not to love about that idea?